Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
RETURN TO LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP SITE
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home / Expertise Search / Harris, Morgan
25 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type
























New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
File Riparian Forest Buffer - CPS 391
by Morgan Harris published Jul 12, 2019 last modified Jul 17, 2023 11:19 AM — filed under: , , , ,
An area predominantly trees and/or shrubs located adjacent to and up-gradient from watercourses or water bodies.
Located in Information Materials / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Conservation Practices
File Stream Habitat Improvement and Management - CPS 395
by Morgan Harris published Jul 12, 2019 last modified Jul 17, 2023 11:29 AM — filed under: , , , ,
Maintain, improve or restore physical, chemical and biological functions of a stream, and its associated riparian zone, necessary for meeting the life history requirements of desired aquatic species.
Located in Information Materials / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Conservation Practices
File Streambank and Shoreline Protection - CPS 580
by Morgan Harris published Jul 12, 2019 last modified Jul 17, 2023 11:35 AM — filed under: , , , ,
Treatment(s) used to stabilize and protect banks of streams or constructed channels, and shorelines of lakes, reservoirs, or estuaries.
Located in Information Materials / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Conservation Practices
File Watering Facility - CPS 614
by Morgan Harris published Jul 12, 2019 last modified Jul 17, 2023 11:36 AM — filed under: , , , ,
A watering facility is a means of providing drinking water to livestock or wildlife.
Located in Information Materials / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Conservation Practices
File Fence - CPS 382
by Morgan Harris published Jul 12, 2019 last modified Jul 17, 2023 11:38 AM — filed under: , , , ,
This practice facilitates the accomplishment of conservation objectives by providing a means to control movement of animals and people, including vehicles.
Located in Information Materials / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Conservation Practices
File Troff document Fence Job Sheet
by Morgan Harris published Jul 12, 2019 last modified Jul 17, 2023 11:41 AM — filed under: , , , ,
NC Fence Job Sheet Installation Instructions
Located in Information Materials / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Job Sheets
File Riparian Forest Buffer
by Morgan Harris published Jul 12, 2019 last modified Jul 17, 2023 11:42 AM — filed under: , , , ,
Buffers are applied on stable areas adjacent to permanent or intermittent streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, and wetlands that flood or pond.
Located in Information Materials / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Job Sheets
File PDF document Eastern Hellbender Structural Habitat Augmentation Guidance
by Morgan Harris published Jun 04, 2024
This is a technical document to provide guidance on the installation of structural habitat for adult and juvenile Eastern Hellbenders. The document details spacing, placement, and specifications for in-stream nest and cover rocks.
Located in Information Materials / NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials / Other Guidance
File SIS package Improving the Utility of Artificial Shelters for Monitoring Eastern Hellbender Salamanders (Cryptobranchus alleganienses alleganiensis)
by Morgan Harris published Aug 10, 2020 last modified Jul 26, 2023 01:31 PM — filed under: , , , , ,
Artificial shelters show great promise as novel, non-invasive tools for studying hellbenders, but their use thus far has faced several challenges. During initial trials in multiple river networks, artificial shelters routinely became blocked by sediment and dislodged during high stream discharge events, and were rarely used by hellbenders. We sought to determine whether these complications could be overcome via alternative shelter design, placement, and maintenance. Between 2013 and 2018, we deployed 438 artificial shelters of two different designs across ten stream reaches and three rivers in the upper Tennessee River Basin. We assessed evidence for several hypotheses, postulating broadly that the availability, stability, and use of artificial shelters by hellbenders would depend on how shelters were constructed, deployed, and/or maintained. We found that maintaining shelters at least once every 40 days limited sediment blockage, and building ~ 40 kg shelters with 3-4 cm thick walls and recessed lids improved their stability during high discharge events. Additionally, we found that hellbenders most frequently occupied and nested in artificial shelters when they were deployed in deeper (~50+ cm) portions of reaches with high adult hellbender densities. Our results suggest that artificial shelters can serve as effective tools for studying hellbenders when designed, deployed, and maintained with these advancements, but also highlight some limitations of their use.
Located in Information Materials / Research / Artificial Nest Box Research
File SIS package Evaluating artificial shelter arrays as a minimally invasive monitoring tool for the hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis)
by Morgan Harris published Aug 10, 2020 last modified Jul 26, 2023 01:32 PM — filed under: , , , , ,
Hellbenders Cryptobranchus alleganiensis are critically imperiled amphibians throughout the eastern USA. Rock-lifting is widely used to monitor hellbenders but can severely disturb habitat. We asked whether artificial shelter occupancy (the proportion of occupied shelters in an array) would function as a proxy for hellbender abundance and there by serve as a viable alternative to rock-lifting. We hypothesized that shelter occupancy would vary spatially in response to hellbender density, natural shelter density, or both, and would vary temporally with hellbender seasonal activity patterns and time since shelter deployment. We established shelter arrays (n = 30 shelters each) in 6 stream reaches and monitored them monthly for up to 2 yr. We used Bayesian mixed logistic regression and model ranking criteria to assess support for hypotheses concerning drivers of shelter occupancy. In all reaches, shelter occupancy was highest from June–August each year and was higher in Year 2 relative to Year 1. Our best-supported model indicated that the extent of boulder and bedrock (hereafter, natural shelter) in a reach mediated the relationship between hellbender abundance and shelter occupancy. More explicitly, shelter occupancy was positively correlated with abundance when natural shelter covered <20% of a reach, but uncorrelated with abundance when natural shelter was more abundant. While shelter occupancy should not be used to infer variation in hellbender relative abundance when substrate composition varies among reaches, we showed that artificial shelters can function as valuable monitoring tools when reaches meet certain criteria, though regular shelter maintenance is critical.
Located in Information Materials / Research / Artificial Nest Box Research