-
Riparian Forest Buffer - CPS 391
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Jul 12, 2019
—
last modified
Jul 17, 2023 11:19 AM
—
filed under:
Eastern Hellbender NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Conservation Practices,
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Resources,
Aquatics
An area predominantly trees and/or shrubs located adjacent to and up-gradient from watercourses or water bodies.
Located in
Information Materials
/
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials
/
Conservation Practices
-
Stream Habitat Improvement and Management - CPS 395
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Jul 12, 2019
—
last modified
Jul 17, 2023 11:29 AM
—
filed under:
Eastern Hellbender NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Conservation Practices,
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Resources,
Aquatics
Maintain, improve or restore physical, chemical and biological functions of a stream, and its associated riparian zone, necessary for meeting the life history requirements of desired aquatic species.
Located in
Information Materials
/
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials
/
Conservation Practices
-
Streambank and Shoreline Protection - CPS 580
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Jul 12, 2019
—
last modified
Jul 17, 2023 11:35 AM
—
filed under:
Eastern Hellbender NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Conservation Practices,
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Resources,
Aquatics
Treatment(s) used to stabilize and protect banks of streams or constructed channels, and shorelines of lakes, reservoirs, or estuaries.
Located in
Information Materials
/
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials
/
Conservation Practices
-
Watering Facility - CPS 614
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Jul 12, 2019
—
last modified
Jul 17, 2023 11:36 AM
—
filed under:
Eastern Hellbender NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Conservation Practices,
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Resources,
Aquatics
A watering facility is a means of providing drinking water to livestock or wildlife.
Located in
Information Materials
/
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials
/
Conservation Practices
-
Fence - CPS 382
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Jul 12, 2019
—
last modified
Jul 17, 2023 11:38 AM
—
filed under:
Eastern Hellbender NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Conservation Practices,
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Resources,
Aquatics
This practice facilitates the accomplishment of conservation objectives by providing a means to control movement of animals and people, including vehicles.
Located in
Information Materials
/
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials
/
Conservation Practices
-
Fence Job Sheet
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Jul 12, 2019
—
last modified
Jul 17, 2023 11:41 AM
—
filed under:
Eastern Hellbender NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Job Sheets,
Resources,
Aquatics
NC Fence Job Sheet Installation Instructions
Located in
Information Materials
/
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials
/
Job Sheets
-
Riparian Forest Buffer
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Jul 12, 2019
—
last modified
Jul 17, 2023 11:42 AM
—
filed under:
Eastern Hellbender NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials,
Job Sheets,
Resources,
Aquatics
Buffers are applied on stable areas adjacent to permanent or intermittent streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, and wetlands that flood or pond.
Located in
Information Materials
/
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials
/
Job Sheets
-
Eastern Hellbender Structural Habitat Augmentation Guidance
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Jun 04, 2024
This is a technical document to provide guidance on the installation of structural habitat for adult and juvenile Eastern Hellbenders. The document details spacing, placement, and specifications for in-stream nest and cover rocks.
Located in
Information Materials
/
NRCS Conservation Practices & Materials
/
Other Guidance
-
Improving the Utility of Artificial Shelters for Monitoring Eastern Hellbender Salamanders (Cryptobranchus alleganienses alleganiensis)
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Aug 10, 2020
—
last modified
Jul 26, 2023 01:31 PM
—
filed under:
Artificial Next Box Research,
Additional Resources,
Eastern Hellbender Additional Resources,
Research,
Aquatics,
Resources
Artificial shelters show great promise as novel, non-invasive tools for studying
hellbenders, but their use thus far has faced several challenges. During initial trials in multiple
river networks, artificial shelters routinely became blocked by sediment and dislodged during
high stream discharge events, and were rarely used by hellbenders. We sought to determine
whether these complications could be overcome via alternative shelter design, placement, and
maintenance. Between 2013 and 2018, we deployed 438 artificial shelters of two different
designs across ten stream reaches and three rivers in the upper Tennessee River Basin. We
assessed evidence for several hypotheses, postulating broadly that the availability, stability, and
use of artificial shelters by hellbenders would depend on how shelters were constructed,
deployed, and/or maintained. We found that maintaining shelters at least once every 40 days
limited sediment blockage, and building ~ 40 kg shelters with 3-4 cm thick walls and recessed
lids improved their stability during high discharge events. Additionally, we found that
hellbenders most frequently occupied and nested in artificial shelters when they were deployed
in deeper (~50+ cm) portions of reaches with high adult hellbender densities. Our results suggest
that artificial shelters can serve as effective tools for studying hellbenders when designed,
deployed, and maintained with these advancements, but also highlight some limitations of their
use.
Located in
Information Materials
/
Research
/
Artificial Nest Box Research
-
Evaluating artificial shelter arrays as a minimally invasive monitoring tool for the hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis)
-
by
Morgan Harris
—
published
Aug 10, 2020
—
last modified
Jul 26, 2023 01:32 PM
—
filed under:
Artificial Next Box Research,
Additional Resources,
Eastern Hellbender Additional Resources,
Research,
Aquatics,
Resources
Hellbenders Cryptobranchus alleganiensis are critically imperiled amphibians throughout the eastern USA. Rock-lifting is widely used to monitor hellbenders but can severely disturb habitat. We asked whether artificial shelter occupancy (the proportion of occupied shelters in an array) would function as a proxy for hellbender abundance and there by serve as a viable alternative to rock-lifting. We hypothesized that shelter occupancy would vary spatially in response to hellbender density, natural shelter density, or both, and would vary temporally with hellbender
seasonal activity patterns and time since shelter deployment. We established shelter arrays (n = 30 shelters each) in 6 stream reaches and monitored them monthly for up to 2 yr. We used Bayesian mixed logistic regression and model ranking criteria to assess support for hypotheses concerning drivers of shelter occupancy. In all reaches, shelter occupancy was highest from June–August each year and was higher in Year 2 relative to Year 1. Our best-supported model indicated that the extent of boulder and bedrock (hereafter, natural shelter) in a reach mediated the relationship between hellbender abundance and shelter occupancy. More explicitly, shelter occupancy was positively correlated with abundance when natural shelter covered <20% of a reach, but uncorrelated with abundance when natural shelter was more abundant. While shelter occupancy should not be used to infer variation in hellbender relative abundance when substrate composition varies among reaches, we showed that artificial shelters can function as valuable monitoring tools when reaches meet certain criteria, though regular shelter maintenance is critical.
Located in
Information Materials
/
Research
/
Artificial Nest Box Research